Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur.
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Counsel refers to Madras HC judgment in M Ajmal Khan vs Election Commission case: Purdah not essential, headscarf is
“Students have been wearing hijabof same colour as uniform”, says Counsel.
“Kendriya Vidyalayas even today permit by a notification female muslim students to wear headscarf of same colour as uniform”.
“If a believer thinks a practice is essential to his faith and that practice is innocuous and does not infringe on anyone’s freedom, then in that context, the test of essential religious practice will not arise”, says Counsel